• TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Fishing trip sucked, no fish, lost the outboard to the lake, it rained.

    Fuck it, I ain’t climbing up on the damn roof.

  • modus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    You are all getting it wrong. That boat is obscuring the rear window. The driver has a creative air scoop for airing out the stench of the rotting hooker carcass in the back. Ingenious, if you ask me.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It’s just a giant cinder block rolling down the highway with ZERO aerodynamics anyway. What’s the difference at this point?

    I would have strapped it to the top, point forward, but I wouldn’t be kidding myself that it would help.

    • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      That’s as far away from a gas station it can get before it has to turn anround and go back to fill up again

    • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      you kid, but if that thing got to highway speeds, it would put some very specific stress on the bow of the boat… I don’t think it would amount to anything since it looks like aluminum, but wood or fiberglass could end up with stress fractures at the hinge point around the roof of the RV… which over time might make it so the front does fall off.

      • Senator Collins@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Well, there are a lot of these boats going around the world all the time, and very seldom does anything like this happen. I just don’t want people thinking that skiffs aren’t safe.

    • FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Funnily enough, that would probably make the aerodynamics worse for the same reason round parachutes have a hole in the top. Without a hole, the air has nowhere to go, so it just fills the cavity with stagnant air and the drag is roughly equivalent to just a flat shape. With a hole in the bottom, now the air has an escape route to take, but it takes a lot of effort to push that much air through the smaller hole, meaning the drag is incresed significantly

      This is the only issue with drilling holes in the boat

  • BloodMuffin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    joke’s on you, the air that boat collects goes straight to his air intake. pushing 50PSI in that puppy

  • Soulphite@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    17 hours ago

    The whole thing is a brick wall… don’t think the boat is making matters much worse.

    Jalopy is fun.

    • bright@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      It’s even possible that the boat adds basically no additional drag, and it’s even remotely possible that it decreases drag. Mythbusters proved that a flatbed pickup truck actually gets worse mileage when driving with the rear door down instead of up, even though it seems like driving with it up would create a big wall that would constantly smash into the air.

      Aerodynamics isn’t nearly as intuitive as people assume.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I loved Mythbusters. It was a much happier time. Evil was not quite out in the open as it is today.

      • Floodedwomb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I watched that episode and they didn’t prove shit. Those tests were terrible. That shit was about as scientific as The Big Bang Theory.

          • UniversalBasicJustice@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I’m not so sure it is. If the leading surface was completely bluff, the length of roof were shorter than the protruding boat and it was moving very fast then yeah, maybe.

            In reality, the nose of the RV plus the length of roof surface along with non-Mach speeds will virtually guarantee the bulk of the airflow will remain coupled to that roof until a radical change in geometry such as the boat.

          • JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Okay but if they would just at the very least, turn that boat around 180°, I’m pretty sure the aerodynamics would improve.

            • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 hours ago

              There’s like a 90% chance you’re right, but aerodynamics gets especially messy with stuff like this that has a more or less flat wall at the back. A significant portion of the drag comes from the turbulence behind the vehicle, rather than cutting (more “plowing” in this case) through the air in front. When you change the geometry of the back, you change that drag.

              So, if I were to bet, I would bet that turning the boat around would help. But I wouldn’t bet my life on it. Some wacky interaction with the geometry of the rear could somehow cause it to get worse.