I’m not so sure it is. If the leading surface was completely bluff, the length of roof were shorter than the protruding boat and it was moving very fast then yeah, maybe.
In reality, the nose of the RV plus the length of roof surface along with non-Mach speeds will virtually guarantee the bulk of the airflow will remain coupled to that roof until a radical change in geometry such as the boat.
You’re going to make me learn OpenFOAM aren’t you
Okay but there’s no way the flow separates from that roof enough to clear the boat
Would you not?
You aren’t ‘taking’ anything. You’ve already paid for it.
Medical professionals are supposed to do no harm. It sounds to me like they did their job. Did they hurt him? Undoubtedly. They also gave him another year of life at minimum, judicially speaking.
Without evidence to the contrary I’m going to believe this was the work of malicious compliance.
Signal has a Note to Self. Bonus; encrypted.
Would Grainger or McMaster Carr fill in the 3M/tool gap?
Good, more for me!