I don’t think you can just aerosolize a cheeseburger and inhale it to replace a meal, if that’s what you’re asking.
Ethanol has caloric value and you can absorb it by breathing, not sure what other substances that applies to though.
I don’t think you can just aerosolize a cheeseburger and inhale it to replace a meal, if that’s what you’re asking.
Ethanol has caloric value and you can absorb it by breathing, not sure what other substances that applies to though.
Don’t worry guys, I’ll totally show those oligarchs by fucking my fellow working people out of money


Not 🏴☠️, but your local library might have access already
Wish.com daemonculaba
Good luck everyone, I avoid toll now


Best time to build muscle for the rest of your life was 20 years ago. Second best time is now.
That looks metal as fuck


https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/02/27/1088154/wifi-sensing-tracking-movements/
WiFi-based human motion detection through barriers


They seem to address that in the last paragraph:
The study combined mortality and demographic data obtained from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention WONDER database (in the US, the collection of mortality data is mandatory and standardized) with latitude data, economic data, and data on access to neurological health care. The primary results are based on US crude mortality rates at the state level. The analysis was then replicated at the global level using mortality data from the World Health Organization and obtained nearly identical results.
I’m unable to reach the original study though.


And got slurped up into chatgpt


Can’t believe I forgot about that. Thanks


Is this the first time they’re using active duty troops and not national guard?


The teenagers of Theseus


Dunno about loose, but Squat University loves the Lock 3 for shoulder health.
At least in PG, that is explicitly not the case, unless I’m misunderstanding:
Similarly, a PL/pgSQL loop of the form FOR x IN query LOOP … END LOOP will never use a parallel plan, because the parallel query system is unable to verify that the code in the loop is safe to execute while parallel query is active.
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/when-can-parallel-query-be-used.html
At any rate, I feel like it’s questionable design to have a user making row-by-row decisions on hard deletes.
You can just insert directly to the helper/audit table, and delete using it, no need for the cursor loop. If you need a handle to go through the records one by one, something else has already gone wrong.
Did I stutter?