

OK, that makes a lot more sense. I read the title and was just confused, since there are so many different engines.


OK, that makes a lot more sense. I read the title and was just confused, since there are so many different engines.


There are many problems everywhere in the world. War, wherever it is occurring, is bad. You do not have to use up all your time thinking about this specific problem. However, you should care about war, because, just as Russia can invade Ukraine, it can invade other countries and other nations can do it too. We should work as a society to control and ban evil activities.


It’s a lot and honest work!
Although I sometimes question the purpose of preserving the past, I really respect people who put in the effort to make something timeless. A time capsule for the future to study an irrelevant and forgotten past.


But the city designer was an American, certainly. There are no other countries/s


Yes, it is used like that. However, not just in english, but in many languages, epicentre is sometimes used with the meaning of “centre of something”.


deleted by creator


deleted by creator


Epicentre - (formal) the central point of something
edit: spelling


No. Please, enlighten me.


what a surprise, nature reduces overheating from the crazy unnatural buildings and moving heat machines


I don’t know about that one chief



it’s not inflation if it just gets more expensive. A rice inflation would mean the grains become bigger and the price would drop, but it’s the oposite. Arguably, it’s a food deflation. And it’s due to the excess of water. Silly Comment Writer (i did click on the article, but did not read it, if anyone is wondering) /s


It was also news that Scotland was going to “establish a specific crime for mass environmental destruction”. The solution to current climate situation is violence.


The current ruling power is already willing. It is the people who are not.


A huge win for people’s rights and climate
Now that it has threads and features for communities I think it’s pretty decent.
I am talking about features and developers themselves. Yes, companies are giant immortals that always existed. However, developers are individuals trying to create something new. And features do work like new bands - some people like them, others don’t and it all depends on how/when they are introduced to the customer.
A different problem which you can identify is, for example, how some companies use the customer as a test subject. They release unfinished features to the public to test them in a real environment. This often causes chaos, as new features tend to have multiple exploits and bugs.
What happened to “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it?”
Saying this in tech is complete nonsense. Nothing is ever not broken! Because there is always something to be polished, acessibility and usability can only be perfected over time.


It’s a lot like a new smaller band, which is trying to make a difference in the world. They might sound terrible, but they have to start somewhere.
Requires account. Alternative link?