Two of America’s most prominent hawks, in two of its most establishment outlets, in the space of 48 hours, have essentially published the obituary of American military primacy. Yesterday I concluded my article by saying that even the arsonists now smell the smoke. Today I’ll say: the arsonists are now writing the fire report.
This is really a tail wagging the dog type of analysis. The US needs to leash their dog, not the other way around.
Correct me if I’m wrong. China acts in a way that’s coherent with an interest in de-escalating the conflict. Which is a rational position, why would China risk nuclear war?
But on r/TankieTheDeprogram some folks are like, China bad, China doesn’t do enough, where are the Chinese missiles???
Yeah… Let’s try to avoid a nuclear winter for now.
Everything I said is true and you didn’t refute any of it.
When you order beef and the waiter brings chicken, you point out the mistake. When the waiter bites your nose, what do you do?
This is a leftist space. Debunking is something done in general forums, when you’re trying to inform the audience. No one here is gonna waste their precious time debunking any of that for the 100th time lol
You made me think of this short essay by my countryman Jones Manoel: Western Marxism, the Fetish for Defeat, and Christian Culture (2020)
I want to argue that there was no reason to recommend him before. Nothing will change my mind that Manufacturing Consent (1988) was written to distract from Inventing Reality (1986). Only one of those books has a dedicated Wikipedia page, and it’s not the one written by the communist.
No people did not know this.
I did. I assumed it was common knowledge. For reference, I’m not American, nor have I ever been to NYC.
Not that I’m against repeating it for people who missed it the first time.
My last experience with Mint might’ve been 10 years ago. The outdated packages so common among Debian-based distros back then made me switch to something else. I don’t know what’s the current situation, though.
Eu tenho interesse. Consigo ler espanhol, mas não escrever.
I’m interested. I can read Spanish, but not write.
You still believe in human nature detached from material conditions, which is an idealist position. There’s nothing convincing anyone can say to you until you challenge this position.