Therapy might still be a good idea in the future, trauma can show up in quite unexpected forms.

I’m really glad you’re doing better!

Thanks for the heads up! My Main account is in slrpnk, so I’ll set a reminder in an month to switch back. :)

Both can be true at the same time. Therapy and meds can be wonderful to help create a better world than the soul-crushing dystopia we’re currently heading for.

This (today’s) article by Cory Doctorow explains it quite nicely:

https://pluralistic.net/2025/01/06/how-the-sausage-gets-made/#governing-is-harder

Thanks, without your comment I’d have skipped this

It’s really fucking tiring to see you americans singing along to the tune of the ‘us vs them’ rhethoric.

I don’t know what he has planned, but in my book he’s the most likely candidate to break the 2-party system.

Enjoy it! I’m happy for you!

This decision takes some courage, so well done :)

Memo: the publishers Wiley, Penguin Random House, Harper Collins and Hachette sued the Internet Archive for over $600m.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hachette_v._Internet_Archive

Yea, fair

'Just pull yerself up by yer own bootstraps, lad!

While I do agree (or at least hope) that we all have the agency to positively influence our own lives and those around us, the main point there in my opinion is that different people have different resources in life. Someone that’s experienced systemic racism, or someone who’s brain is a wee bit non-standard just has it harder than someone not experiencing these issues.

The natural habitat has been altered using chemicals, farming methods, or terraforming to a degree that the current ecosystem can not sustain itself without human intervention

I think artificial is the proper therm here. Not in a sense that they’re gene modified or robot bugs, but in a sense that their dominance of the habitat is due to human interference.

Yea, I really liked these as a kid. Shame their chocolate is collected by slaves :|

Behave by Robert Sapolsky. It’s an excellent book if you’re trying to understand why the people around you are like… well, that way. But if you didn’t study neuroscience, you’ll likely have to re-read it to get at least the most important points to stick.

The implication is that they (well… we) can’t do what’s necessary in a low-effort scenario I’d say.

Kind of similar to calling someone a mouthbreather

I agree that there should definitely be safety regulations in place for ship recycling, but this guy is building a strawman argument and it really undermines his point in my view.

‘Just’

deleted by creator

Not malitious - this is a case of chaotic good. If it’s funny and harms noone, roll with it!