

7·
4 months agoI find it important to support projects that contribute to the greater free software ecosystem. I pick projects I benefit from and whose continued existence I am invested in, despite any faults.
Amateur typesetting enthusiast.


I find it important to support projects that contribute to the greater free software ecosystem. I pick projects I benefit from and whose continued existence I am invested in, despite any faults.
I can understand giving up on FreeBSD–OpenBSD at least offers to install & configure a graphical environment with a graphical login screen during the installation process, which makes it much easier to get up and running for desktop or laptop use (on supported hardware).


In order to make a change to the rules and tradition of anything, easy or not, it must be justified. Is there any reason to change the colors or rules concerning which player opens?
I use GNU Stow for mine so the dotfiles I care about are included in my file-level backups. Once I restore my files, I can just run the
stow(8)command to create the symbolic links. But, if I just want the dotfiles without the rest of my files, I would usescp(1)to copy the stow directory over to a new system, because it would be simplest. I don’t use version control with my stow directory (yet).