This is kind of a silly argument. The state is not a person. When they fine you money, it is not identical to someone stealing from you.

Don’t forget the seat / water heater! And the butt-dryer

I work in autonomous vehicle engineering. That’s not even on the table for something we’d consider doing. But China is trying to enter the market hard, and I am less sure they wouldnt do that.

Uhh. Cocaine is demonstrably more dangerous than amphetamines or opiates. Cocaine is cardiotoxic at any amount, and the damage is cumulative. Neither of the other two do that.

Half of the US is on rx amps daily, and they aren’t dying if heart attacks left and right.

I’d argue benzos should be higher than heroin for dependence. You can’t cold turkey a bad benzo addiction, but you can with heroin.

Thanks for the graphic, but many of those are laughably wrong. I guess it depends on their specific definitions. But for example solvents do irreversible damage with every use; meanwhile heroin is a drug available with a prescription (usually just in hospital use) and doesn’t do almost any long term damage on its own.

Cocaine is also cardiotoxic at any level

And yet another factor is that cocaine is cardiotoxic. You’re literally killing your heart with every use.

Source? Cutting cocaine almost always makes it safer, not more dangerous.

Ironically, cocaine would be safer if it were cut with those 3 drugs

There are plenty of “hard drugs” you can do with very little damage to your body. Cocaine is not one of them. In fact, it’s one of the worst things you can do for your heart.

But the dead Israeli babies DO want to exterminate the Palestinians? What a weird point you’re trying to make.

Uh, it’s a nice saying, but it’s not really that true. There are some defining differences in terrorists and fighting a war

You could say that about literally every war

All this time and you don’t even understand the term human shield 🤣🤣

I think their point is that: of course it’s not the intention to wipe them out, because if it was, it would already have been done on Oct 8th. Which isn’t a terrible argument.

Hamas has stated it wants to genocide Israel, and their actions match that. Indiscriminate rocket fire, suicide bombing, invading etc. essentially everything they can do.

By contrast Israel has not (officially) said they want to genocide Palestine, and they aren’t using even a fraction of the weapons at their disposal. Personally, I see their actions more as angry and sloppy. What’s the alternative, that they’re going to kill hundreds of people a day for the next years? That’s ridiculous.

Wait, so you’re claiming that Israelis are Middle Eastern but are trying to exterminate themselves and preserve white people? I am so confused by your insane argument.

As for the evidence, you linked me a sketchy article from a non-reliable source. Just Google “Hamas human shields” and set the year to 2014, 2015, 2016… It’s one of their longest running traditions and has been acknowledged by the UN and virtually every country on earth.

To be honest, this is probably just a troll account so I’m not sure why I’m even wasting the time.

White supremacist? Bro we’re talking about two Middle Eastern countries.

Moreover, you showing when Israelis have used human shields doesn’t even remotely prove or disprove anything Palestine has done. So respectfully, no.

Kinda weird that Hamas only wanted prisoners back who were convicted of violent crimes then?

Your understanding of international law is absolutely frightening. Go ask ChatGPT that question before you say it out loud again.

I don’t think it’s pedantic to point out that is saying there is a “risk” of genocide. It’s not saying there is a genocide.