started using it today, it still is in early stages of development and it’s pretty bugged, but it’s very cool.

the main doubt I have now is if it would be more useful of you could fake activity coherent with your location, for example, because being in EU and faking visits to US gov sites doesn’t exactly sound as stealth.

I could be wrong though.

AdNauseam works on pages you are visiting, as far as I understood.

Fauxx instead does its thing independently in the background.

just as an FYI, having JavaScript off potentially adds to your fingerprint.

good point.

gottem!

I am not very uplifted to be honest since the same technology and devices can be used for large scale surveillance.

very interesting article, the building comparison kinda blew my mind.

Unfortunately I feel the visceral need to criticize the “unnecessary beautiful” of the Microslop icons, because in my opinion they are not only ugly, but also “soulless”, like the glass building.

yes and I would also justify sabotaging the infrastructure from which the EU buys fuel from Russia, even if such things directly affect me.

As the Trump administration sought to reassure Americans this week that a hantavirus outbreak posed little risk to the public, Dr. Brian Christine, one of the top public health officials in charge of infectious disease policy, stood before reporters in Nebraska promising a response “grounded in science” and “grounded in transparency.”

Before he joined the Trump administration last year, Christine was an Alabama-based urologist who specialized in penile implants. He has little public health experience and a history of far-right commentary and promoting conspiracy theories. He’s said the Covid pandemic led to a wider government plot to control people, compared the Biden administration to Nazi Germany and suggested the Covid vaccine had little effect in stopping the pandemic.

He once hosted a YouTube show called “Erection Connection,” a professional YouTube series on erectile dysfunction for fellow urologists.

A CNN review of archived podcast episodes, social media posts and radio appearances found that Christine repeatedly framed public health institutions, the federal government and pandemic-era policies as tools used to target conservatives and religious Americans.

In comments made on a podcast he hosted while running for Alabama state Senate in 2022, Christine questioned the legitimacy of the 2020 election.

He also advocated for abortion bans without exceptions for rape or incest and suggested there may have been a worldwide effort involving George Soros and figures associated with the World Economic Forum’s “Great Reset” to use the pandemic to force small businesses to close.

Christine repeatedly criticized Covid mandates, arguing that the vaccines neither prevented disease nor transmission, despite evidence the vaccines prevented millions of deaths.

Andrew Nixon, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Media Relations at the US Department of Health and Human Services, told CNN, “Assistant Secretary for Health Admiral Christine remains focused on executing President Trump and Secretary Kennedy’s agenda to Make America Healthy Again and deliver on President Trump’s Executive Order to protect our children against chemical and surgical mutilation.”

Christine, a surgeon who went directly from private practice to helping lead the federal government’s public health response, took office last November as assistant secretary for health. Brian Christine, nominee to be assistant Health and Human Services secretary for health, testifies before the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee on Capitol Hill July 16, 2025.

While some of his views were previously reported by The Washington Post during his nomination process, CNN reviewed several additional podcast episodes that appeared to have been deleted from YouTube and Apple Podcasts before his confirmation but remained publicly accessible on Vimeo, where they had been embedded on his former campaign website.

His senior role at the Department of Health and Human Services places him in charge of offices responsible for family planning, women’s health, infectious disease policy and the US Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, the uniformed health service of more than 5,000 public health officers who work across the federal government and deploy during public health emergencies. As head of the Public Health Service, Christine also serves as a four-star admiral in charge of the uniformed service.

Since assuming the post, Christine has led efforts to restrict gender transition care through federal blocks on funding, though the Wall Street Journal reported his private practice office advertised treating transgender people for erectile dysfunction – a claim Christine denied. His personal website also noted his practice offered, “erectile dysfunction in patients who have undergone female-to-male gender reassignment.”

Christine has been a frequent critic of the Biden administration.

“There are things that are similar that were going on in Germany that are going on in the United States right now,” Christine said on one episode of “Common Sense” in 2022. “There aren’t concentration camps in the United States, but there’s no question that conservatives feel threatened. There’s no questions that conservatives like myself and others feel like the government is being weaponized against us.”

A since-deleted Twitter account of Christine’s also showed commentary in line with MAGA activism, including efforts to overturn the 2020 election. In December 2020, Christine retweeted a call from conservative activist Charlie Kirk to urge Republicans to object to the election results on January 6, 2021.

“BREAKING: Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri will OBJECT to the election results on January 6th This is what courage looks like. This is what it means to FIGHT! RT if every other Republican needs to do the same!” the post read, which was retweeted by Christine.

Christine’s account also showed repeated engagement with Vernon Jones, the former Georgia Democratic state representative who switched parties to support Donald Trump and later became a supporter of 2020 election fraud claims. ‘Common Sense’ podcast

Christine’s podcast, called “Common Sense,” focused on abortion, Covid restrictions, transgender rights, religion and what he described as “wokeism” in medicine and government.

In one episode titled, “When Healthcare is Used Against You,” from October 2022, Christine argued the pandemic had been used by the government to control Americans and influence the outcome of the 2020 election.

“This is probably the most important thing that’s happened during the pandemic. There is no question that the pandemic was used to influence the outcome of the 2020 elections,” Christine said, later urging listeners to watch “2000 Mules,” the debunked election fraud conspiracy film whose distributor later apologized and removed it from circulation.

In the same episode, Christine claimed the Covid vaccine “ultimately was proved not to prevent the disease and not to prevent the spread of the disease.”

“We know that there have been people who have died from that, but we also know that most people who get infected aren’t going to die. Most people who get infected aren’t going to get sick. But the government and the left have used the pandemic to control people,” he said. Criticism of vaccine mandates In this March 16, 2021 file photo, a sign advertises a restaurant opening in Santa Monica, California.

“We’ve been forced to take the vaccination, how? Well, the government said, if you don’t take the vaccine, you may lose your job. You may lose your income. There were threats in this way. And so a lot of individuals were forced to take the vaccine and to take the boosters. And if someone wanted to take the vaccine, I think that’s fine. But forcing people to take a vaccination is absolutely wrong.”

He also suggested there may have been a coordinated effort involving “George Soros and the World Economic Forum” to use the pandemic and the so-called Great Reset to benefit multinational corporations while small businesses shut down.

“Now, was there a worldwide concerted effort to close small businesses and to force them out of business? I don’t know if there was, but it looks mighty suspicious to me,” he added. Abortion views

In comments on Facebook and in his podcast, Christine also repeatedly defended Alabama’s near-total abortion ban after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022.

In an episode of his podcast titled “Abortion Laws,” Christine said Alabama’s abortion ban should not include exceptions for rape or incest.

“Now that causes the pro-abortion side of the argument to get really upset that we don’t exclude rape and incest,” Christine said. “But just because the pregnancy occurs through an act of violence, that doesn’t mean the unborn child doesn’t have the right to life and we recognize and we believe that another act of violence and an abortion is an act of violence. We recognize and believe that another act of violence isn’t going to make things right.”

“So there’s no exclusion for rape and incest. That’s the Alabama law. I think it makes sense,” he added.

precisely

well it is a half lie, because he’s not thinking about them at all, not just in Iran talks.

there are countless apps that do the exact same thing and they have been out there for many, many years.

I haven’t seen them changing anything.

EDIT: also google knows this very well and the feature is clearly designed to be as useless as possible and to be ignored by 99% of the users.

An anti-doomscrolling feature is now built into Android. (Yes, things have gotten that bad.)

On Tuesday, Google announced Pause Point, which is designed to keep users from engaging with addictive apps on Android, the mobile operating system that powers Google’s Pixel smartphones, Samsung devices, and others.

Pause Point works by requiring a 10-second pause after you open any app you’ve labeled for yourself as being a distraction. TikTok, Instagram, X, and even Google’s YouTube could be the kinds of apps labeled as “distracting” by Android device owners worried about the power of time-sucking algorithms to eat away at their day.

With the addition, Google isn’t only thinking of users’ well-being, of course.

It’s reacting to increasing regulatory pressure around social media harms and algorithmic dangers. Today, many countries and U.S. states have created laws to restrict or ban minors from using social media, as the impacts of these apps on young people’s mental well-being have become better understood.

Google can now point to a feature like Pause Point to claim it’s part of the solution, not the problem.

“Android is more capable than ever, but we also want to give you the tools to disconnect when you need to,” explained Dieter Bohn, previously executive editor at The Verge, now director of product operations for Google’s Platforms & Ecosystems organization, in a press briefing about the Android 17 update.

“I think that we are all guilty of going into our phone and then opening some app and getting stuck on autopilot, and an hour has gone by,” he said.

To date, social media app makers, including YouTube, have turned to the idea of app timers as a way to remind you to take a break or stop scrolling. Pause Point flips that idea on its head, as it interrupts the app’s launch — and the dopamine flood that follows — to force you to stop and rethink whether this is what you actually want to do, or is just a habit you’d like to break.

Google says you could use the time Pause Point enables to do a short breathing exercise or to think about other things you could do instead of scrolling. For instance, the feature can suggest more worthwhile apps, like a favorite fitness app, an audiobook app, the Kindle or Google Play Books app, or others.

You can also choose to scroll through some favorite photos for ideas — perhaps those reminding you of other engaging activities, like outdoor walks, your pets, or arts and crafts.

Plus, Pause Point lets you choose to set an app timer before you dive in, which makes the time you spend in-app feel more intentional at the start. This could work better than a default timer, which is always set for the same length of time, even as the circumstances leading you to take a break from scrolling can vary.

The feature is harder to turn off than traditional app timers, too, many of which can simply be ignored. Instead, Pause Point requires a phone restart to turn it off, Google says, which also makes you think before disabling it.

Pause Point may not be as fun (or adorable) as the screen-time-focused or self-care apps like Finch or Hank Green’s Focus Friend, but it does have the advantage of being built into Android itself, which could help it gain traction.

thank you, I didn’t read the comments to be honest.

sounds not only absurd but also counterproductive based on the images.

also the head is hotter while wearing the device?

it definitely must not be as easy as it seems.

what could possibly go wrong?

This disables the QUIC graceful shutdown feature, and thus closes the leak. The mitigation will persist across reboots, but it may be undone by system updates, in which case the steps will need to be repeated.

Performing this mitigation means that the server-side QUIC socket will remain half-open until it times out, which should generally not negatively affect the Android device or apps running on it. However, only use the command at your own risk if you understand the implications.

does anyone know what are the implications of the fix proposed?

Philosopher Nick Bostrom recently posted a paper, where he postulated that a small chance of AI annihilating all humans might be worth the risk, because advanced AI might relieve humanity of “its universal death sentence.” That upbeat gamble is quite a leap from his previous dark musings on AI, which made him a doomer godfather. His 2014 book Superintelligence was an early examination of AI’s existential risk. One memorable thought experiment: An AI tasked with making paper clips winds up destroying humanity because all those resource-needy people are an impediment to paper clip production. His more recent book, Deep Utopia, reflects a shift in his focus. Bostrom, who leads Oxford’s Future of Humanity Institute, dwells on the “solved world” that comes if we get AI right.

STEVEN LEVY: Deep Utopia is more optimistic than your previous book. What changed for you?

NICK BOSTROM: I call myself a fretful optimist. I am very excited about the potential for radically improving human life and unlocking possibilities for our civilization. That’s consistent with the real possibility of things going wrong.

You wrote a paper with a striking argument: Since we’re all going to die anyway, the worst that can happen with AI is that we die sooner. But if AI works out, it might extend our lives, maybe indefinitely.

That paper explicitly looks at only one aspect of this. In any given academic paper, you can’t address life, the universe, and the meaning of everything. So let’s just look at this little issue and try to nail that down.

That isn’t a little issue.

I guess I’ve been irked by some of the arguments made by doomers who say that if you build AI, you’re going to kill me and my children and how dare you. Like the recent book If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies. Even more probable is that if nobody builds it, everyone dies! That’s been the experience for the last several 100,000 years.

But in the doomer scenario everybody dies and there’s no more people being born. Big difference.

I have obviously been very concerned with that. But in this paper, I’m looking at a different question, which is, what would be best for the currently existing human population like you and me and our families and the people in Bangladesh? It does seem like our life expectancy would go up if we develop AI, even if it is quite risky.

In Deep Utopia you speculate that AI could create incredible abundance, so much that humanity might have a huge problem with finding purpose. I live in the United States. We’re a very rich country, but our government, ostensibly with support of the people, has policies that deny services to the poor and distribute rewards to the rich. I think that even if AI was able to provide abundance for everyone, we would not supply it to everyone.

You might be right. Deep Utopia takes as its starting point the postulation that everything goes extremely well. If we do a reasonably good job on governance, everybody gets a share. There is quite a deep philosophical question of what a good human life would look like under these ideal circumstances.

The meaning of life is something you hear a lot about in Woody Allen movies and maybe in the philosophers community. I’m worried more about the wherewithal to support oneself and get a stake in this abundance.

The book is not only about meaning. That’s one out of a bunch of different values that it considers. This could be a wonderful emancipation from the drudgery that humans have been subjected to. If you have to give up, say, half of your waking hours as an adult just to make ends meet, doing some work you don’t enjoy and that you don’t believe in, that’s a sad condition. Society is so used to it that we’ve invented all kinds of rationalizations around it. It’s like a partial form of slavery.

When the moment comes when AI writes philosophy papers better than you do, will some meaning be drained from your existence?

I think so. The ability to make some big contribution to the world, or help save the world, or ensure the future will be out of my hands, and maybe out of everybody’s hands.

On the other hand, a philosophy paper written by a human could be more valuable than a much cleverer, deeper philosophy paper written by a nonhuman, because I’m a human and that relates to me.

I guess you could have philosophy as kind of a sport.

That’s not just sport. The proclamations of a robot aren’t as meaningful to me as those of a fellow human.

I guess it’s the same if you retire after a career you’re passionate about and feel you’re good at. Maybe you have a great retirement, and you enjoy relaxing and reading the books you have time for, and playing with your grandkids, but there’s still something probably that you might miss, that you feel is lost. Maybe this will be analogous to a big retirement for humanity, but hopefully a retirement of enormous vitality. These utopians living in the solved world would be doing things like games and aesthetic, spiritual, and religious activities.

If you were in charge of one of the hyperscalers, what would you do differently than what they’re doing now?

A bigger effort should be done on the welfare of digital minds. Anthropic has been a pioneer there. It’s not clear that current AIs have moral status yet, but starting the process brings us into a mindset as a civilization to do more as these systems become sophisticated. It’s very plausible that some of these digital minds that we’re constructing will have various degrees of moral status, just as we think pigs and dogs have moral status. If you kick somebody’s dog, maybe you harm the owner, but it’s also bad because it hurts the dog. If AIs have a conception of self as existing through time and life, goals that they want to achieve, and the ability to form reciprocal relationships with other beings and humans, then I think there would be ways of treating them that would be wrong.

In your book you say maybe we shouldn’t treat “digital minds” as if they were animals in factory farming. I’m worried about whether they might make us the animals in some equivalent of factory farming.

Hence the importance of the alignment problem. We are not just waiting for these AI super-beings to come into existence and hoping that they will be friendly, we get to shape them and raise them. That gives us an opportunity to increase the chances that they will have some affinity for us.

If AIs have goals that run counter to ours, wouldn’t that be a failure to align them with human values?

If we fail to solve the alignment, as we probably will do at least to some degree, it’s important that they can be accommodated and given a good future. There are a lot of win-win opportunities that arise if we approach them not merely as objects to be exploited to the maximum degree, but try to foster a positive relationship. The most important relationship, ultimately, might be the one between humans and AIs. So it would be more promising that the relationship goes well if we start by taking some steps towards being generous and kind and respectful.

[This interview was edited for length and coherence.]

nice, gonna use the fix as soon as I get home.

EDIT:

This disables the QUIC graceful shutdown feature, and thus closes the leak. The mitigation will persist across reboots, but it may be undone by system updates, in which case the steps will need to be repeated.

Performing this mitigation means that the server-side QUIC socket will remain half-open until it times out, which should generally not negatively affect the Android device or apps running on it. However, only use the command at your own risk if you understand the implications.

anyone knows the implications of this?