I noticed them talking about one of their softwares being licensed under FSL, not having heard of it, I looked it up and…

https://fsl.software/

They kinda lost me at

What about AGPLv3 though? AGPLv3 is not permissive enough.

However, in the original article, this section definitely had me thinking. I thoroughly agree with the author’s stance on this, and I wonder if their alternatives will actually solve the problem.

As the former VP of Community at Discourse (GPLv2) I spent half a decade participating in the making of certifiably Free, Open Source Software that got put to use by literal nazis to amplify their organized hate, and all we had to say for ourselves was “well, the license says free for everyone”.

It makes me think of “”“Truth”" Social" using Mastodon code, and illegally at that. I guess… at a certain point if a bad actor is gonna be bad… Will a license stop them? I’m unconvinced that AGPL isn’t enough, but I could still be won over.

So long as my freedoms as a regular individual are maintained with the software that I use and love (my primary concern is some megacorp enshittifier being able to just take the stuff I use on the daily) then I’m open to new licensing schemes. I could be won over.

Definitely very neat.

Completely not what the article calls it.

I mean, it’s like calling a car modeling/customization webpage a Forza clone.

Or calling Mick Gordon’s YouTube page a DOOM clone.

Who is us? I don’t feel particularly hated.

God that’s ugly.

Also, don’t post an image (and then tag it as NSFW‽) for a text post!

If I’m looking for a text post, maybe I want to read discussion, and I see an image, I’ll skip it.

If I want to see images, and then see something that makes no sense and has no context, I’ll be irritated and confused when I realize it’s a nonsequitur attachment to a text post.

And it has been for almost 22 years.

Linux is not a corporation, there is no boot to lick.

What a wild take. I’m genuinely baffled that someone thought that “Linux bootlickers” was a remotely salient thing to say.

In my opinion, this title is somewhat misleading, maybe even clickbait when you consider how many games are actually shutting down.

Should by My Last Days of Animal Crossing. The game isn’t shutting down or going anywhere.

Glad I’m not crazy. Or at least I’m not the only crazy one. Bear’s ears look like Ackbar’s eyes.

In case anyone wants to compare

That’s fair, but I feel like the point is that many people go through a process where

1. You pay money
2. The buttons on your screen say “buy” “purchase” “check-out” or something else to that effect

That feels like buying media, so according to the common “consumer” (hate that word) brain, you are spending money to buy content.

At the same time, media corps have been trying to teach us for years that piracy is exactly the same as stealing.

The whole point of the shorthand is to explain that these are not facts, they’re misconceptions, AND both of these misconceptions exist for the same reason, corporate propaganda.

Mr. McMuscles always seems to get his hands on the most interesting details. I look forward to every release he makes.

Hence the new in-game MTX shop.

Oh well… 🏴‍☠️

You might be horny, but you’re also correct. Eyes are drawn to these things on an instinctual level.

Cool. Thanks!

Terminator Resistance? It’s been on my steam wishlist for a while.

Is it worth $20? I’m on the fence.

That’s very informative! Thanks.

This is fascinating, may I ask how you see who is voting on your comments? U didn’t realize this was possible. Is it only because you’re the admin of your own instance?