me too, I would like to understand.

1. Why this post is down voted
2. why the OP is banned ?

Thank you all for your input !

I still didn’t found a solution… to my goal…

purism was looking really good ! but the price is outside my range.

Thank you all for yours input

What finally did work

if [[ -z VARIABLE1 && -z VARIABLE2 ]]; then
    echo "OK"
fi

If only Linux was using Python syntax that would be so much more intuitive…

not working, both variables do not exist and the echo "OK" do not trigger.

Thank you all for your input’s !

As I’m not familiar enough with BGP, AS etc…

I think I’ll go for the list generated by
https://github.com/lord-alfred/ipranges
https://github.com/sakib-m/IP-Prefix-List

To start with.

Then I’ll see if it’s possible to gather those IP ranges without relying on third party services…
but that seem unfeasible without be connect to a Internet Exchange Point (IXP) right ?

Thank you @WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com Are you sure your link is correct ? I get

This page does not seem to exist…

Thank you all for your input’s ! \

So I have created a table , that I’ll put in my first post.

Feel free to post update like

|brand|model|Price €|GPIO pair|CP|Lan Ports|idle watt|Surface area cm²|Storage ports| WiFi / BT|url|
|Raspberry Pi|Pi 5 B (4GB)|52|12|Quad-core Cortex-A72 (ARM v8) 64-bit SoC @ 1.5GHz.|1x 1GbE|3|47|SD|||

or even without the row header

Thanks @Frederic@beehaw.org
Yes, Nice distro, but unfortunately their RPI respin use systemD 👎
 
https://forum.mxlinux.org/viewtopic.php?t=85188

Thank you @tasankovasara@sopuli.xyz

Let me re phrase your answer:
… should be available in your distro repository…

indeed I’ve downloaded a couples of thing but nothing had what I was needed, but with the information within those packages I’ve found https://mailfud.org/geoip-legacy and it works like a charms

Only this: https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/ideas/gecko-firefox-supporting-python-to-interact-with-the-html-dom/idi-p/20158

I don’t see python on your image :)

Thanks all for your input !

So yes /sdcard was /storage/emulated/0 and it’s a real sd-card.

That was indeed formatted as FAT, I reformatted into EXT4 (from a desktop Linux) put the SD-card back into the phone and started the phone.

Ive tried (in the phone)

su
chmod 777 /storage/emulated/0 #yes it's still mounted as emulated !
stat /storage/emulated/0
#...
#Access: (0771)
#....

So I’m still blocked… any ideas ?

Thanks.

I’ve found the most simple way (for my case) adb shell 'a command'

example

adb shell ls /

Thank you all for your input… but it seem my question is still not fully answered…

let me rephrase, I’m not looking to have a GUI to transfer files, but I would like to execute terminal command remotely (from my computer) to my android phone. Like SSH .

So I’ve read that I can install a SSH server on my android phone… (If you know some’s (FLOSS), I’m all ears) Or if you know a better way than SSH I’m all ears too.

Thanks.

setfacl -m m:r aFile
#re set the mask

solve the problem, but the question is: why the F**** this is happening !?

Update, this is only happening when I copy files from a ~SMB share… :'(
Otherwise it’s correct…

Proxmox seem powerfull

It’s a Type1, not Type2
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypervisor#Classification

Thank you all !

Indeed setting execute perm on example, sub1, sub2, static

The program/user have now access to the directory.

In order words all the parents directory need at least execute in order to have access in the targeted directory…

Now I gave 751 for static. Meaning than others (here nginx) cannot list the files within. But never the less it works
the static files are appearing when requested (HTTP) but forbidding nginx to list the directory is changing something ? (performance/security)

Thanks

I’ve received a lot of reactions on the original post: https://programming.dev/post/10465121

But if someone is involved with the development of Thunderbird I think this is worth reading: https://programming.dev/comment/7677398

For my part I will use the OpenPGP sigin tools for now.

Cheers.

Thank you all for your quick reactions !!

To summarize if I want to use the PDF built-in signing I will need to convert my OpenPGP into a X.509 cert otherwise I can simply use the OpenPGP file signing

I want to stick to the UNIX Philosophy especially:

Write programs that do one thing and do it well.

So I will use the OpenPGP signing tool :)

Thanks !