

I see, so you believe it’s regional dependent, and we should be focussed on the least harmful methods/plan?
Just a guy. Literally. What more can I say?


I see, so you believe it’s regional dependent, and we should be focussed on the least harmful methods/plan?


I’m more wondering, is one better than the other? Is it practical for them to co-exist?
To answer your question directly: I don’t know, depends on if it can work ig. But also: we have finite resources, so where should those resources be spent/focused?


Yet, it seems like there’s always this massive push in the UK to build more nuclear plants, so where (and why) does that idea come from? Is it about quick, cheap energy?


This veers dangerously close to the horseshoe analogy…


That’s an interesting point. I’ll definitely be more wary of scapegoat answers now.


Shame we don’t live in a sane world then, i guess


In other words: people hear what they want to, an easy scapegoat answer.


Wow, it’s amazing what the memory can do.


its factions usually don’t get along with each other simply because their projects are incompatible
What do you mean by that? Can you give me an example?


That’s why the story is so heavily scrutinised, it just doesn’t seem real. He was interviewed for a book and made similar dubious claims for other bodies he saw:
There was a man having a seizure and his eyes were rolling into the back of his head. He had struck the pavement so hard that there was virtually nothing else left of him
I feel like he is just using colourful language to some extent.


I must admit; when you read his words, they sound more and more unbelievable. He said in a book:
There was a man having a seizure and his eyes were rolling into the back of his head. He had struck the pavement so hard that there was virtually nothing else left of him
That seems contradictory to me, and now thanks to him I have the sadly comical image of a severed head having a seizure. How unrealistically campy


Oops, my bad, I copied the wrong link!!! Allow me to find the article I was reading earlier, it was much more detailed
Edit: here you go https://911graphiccontent.quora.com/The-Black-Tag


Reading this reminds me (I think) of a memory of Avengers Infinity War I had: After seeing it in the cinema, I always remembered Star Lord saying something like ‘is it still the greatest band on earth’ and Iron Man saying ‘it never was’ (and no: I’m not misremembering the Footloose bit, as when I saw it in the cinema, I remembered both scenes distinctly). Yet, every time I’ve seen that movie since, Iron Man’s ‘it never was’ scene has never been seen (by me, at least).


Yeah that Nat Geo interview is pretty pants. Try reading the article in the post above, it’s a little more detailed/offers alternative perspectives


Possibly tbf. Just seems like a pretty weird thing to make up though (unless he made it up subconsciously or something)


Gotta say, not that others explanations aren’t good too, but I think yours is, so far, the most clear cut explanation


Kind of ironic given the right are the ones always trying to close borders, etc.


So… pancreatic cancer that metastasised to his testicles?


That actually makes sense tbf
Don’t suppose you have the statistics to back that one up, do you?