This is misleading, there is no investigation. They just review some additional documents flagged by the public. So the strategy now is to release documents only when their existence can no longer be denied.

I read the comment to only refer to the way AI was used.

If I say I have notes on powerful people and say that empowers me, that’s bragging. Not blackmail, because those people might not even know. If I were to say it to those powerful people, it could be perceived as threatening. But it’s not blackmail, as I don’t demand anything. If I were to use those notes to get something done: that’s blackmail.

The NYT is just reporting what’s ‘fit to print’. Unless there’s verified proof of actual blackmail this description seems apt. Saying you have information on people and you may use it is not blackmail, as that would require a direct request.

When you read the article, it’s just that there is an appeal that’s unlikely to get picked up. Headline seems a bit hysterical.

Reminds me of this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tobacco_smoke_enema

The speaker will not become president unless Vance and Trump become incapacitated at the same time. When just Trump becomes incapacitated, they can choose a new vice president.

The announcement states it’s a new product.

Nytimes says basically the same: “In fact, it would be hard to imagine an event that could have gone better from the point of view of the Russian leader, who made no public commitment to stop his assault on Ukraine and yet was treated as a valued friend. Mr. Trump did not fault Mr. Putin for starting the brutal war and left without mentioning the sanctions that just hours earlier he had threatened to impose if there were no deal.”

Maybe Garmin, Withings or (Chinese owned now) Suunto?

You can even train to beat them, so it’s definitely not a reliable method.

I have the second issue on Linux often. Happy to hear it’s not just me.

What would have been a better headline? There is no way to verity the story. The actual reason might be different. Also there are plenty “Trump claims” headlines.

In the nytimes article it does mention him taking those as wel.

Each president is different in the manner and pace at which they receive their briefings, and Trump is not entirely out of step with some of his predecessors.

But with Trump, there is added concern as he is known not to read the accompanying briefing document, referred to as “the book,” that is put together by intelligence analysts in a highly labor-intensive process. This document is delivered in hard copy or on a tablet device to the president and his key advisers five days a week.

It started on 4chan, only moved to 8chan (likely a different poster) much later.

See for example: https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/how-three-conspiracy-theorists-took-q-sparked-qanon-n9005

Q posts moved from 4chan to its more toxic offshoot 8chan in November after a post claiming the original board had been “infiltrated.”

Didn’t apple disable PWA’s in Europe?

I’m sure the DOGE guys will clear the list of any victims such as current administration officials.

Probably part of Trumps plan to reduce unemployment.