

Squirting an unidentifiable liquid in someone’s face is terrorism.
It was identified as something harmless. Terrorism is the use of deadly violence on soft, civilian targets. Generally, assaults on political leaders are considered something else. Terrorism is the continued threat of future deadly violence, not of squirting vinegar on people.
Until it’s tested in a lab, no one knows what it is.
I don’t think a lab test was required to figure out it was harmless. It was vinegar.
It could be a strong acid, it could be a nerve agent. Neither of those things are unheard of, and either one can maim or kill in a matter of minutes.
Yeah, but it wasn’t. If someone hit one of those ICE thugs with a black water balloon that was indeed filled with harmless water, would you support charging the thrower with terrorism?
Using fear or violence
No, it’s using violence to create fear of future violence. That’s the literal definition. Your personal definition waters down “terrorism” to a ludicrous extent.



Yeah so they can vote for Republicans anyway. No one is forcing them into it. “deprograming” Qanon wasn’t turning people into Democrats. Again, these are adults making adult choices for which they are responsible.