I’m guessing the Christian argument would be exposure. Those in church get taught morality. Not everyone in school goes to church. They can force everyone to hear it.
That said, if you need the threat of hellfire to be moral or good, are you really moral or just performative?
On one hand, it IS an unpopular opinion. On the other it’s cause it’s dumb.
It’s The Onion right?.. Right?
The real learning was the learning we did along the way.
It hasn’t gone out to “all”.
But how hard is it to clean the inevitable fur and hairball puke?
I appreciate the reply.
Im definitely going to start beginner friendly. I’m just trying to get a handle on what the differences tangiby mean ahead of it. Every explanation i find seems to be. “You do more, you can customize more, it’s more powerful, or only losers dont use the hardest thing possible”. Ok, the last one was a joke, kind of.
I’m comfortable with tech but clueless with Linux. What does all this mean?!
But seriously, why would you want endeavorOS instead of sometbing youre saying is more simple, like Mint?
I’ve been dragging my feet on making the switch. Some of it is i just doing feel like doing another OS install and desktop setup. Some of it is distro paralysis. There’s a lot and I dont really know what to choose.
I downloaded Mint Cinnamon a while back and was too lazy to install it. Is this still a good choice for gaming and school work? I already use libreoffice.
I’m comfortable enough with configuring and settings, but by no means a superuser.
Typically subscription plans dont give you access to titles on day 1 of release. You have a choice of buying it or waiting.
Gamepass gives access to many titles day 1.
It would be nice if they sanctioned them by using their militaries to stop the invasion and push them out.
Make him pay for it.
Sounds more like bad porn writing than Dress and Appearance!
Skirts are optional. One of the authorized items that can be worn by women.
We have “dress” skirt uniforms, unless you’re alluding to “combat” skirts.
I came to say this. Don’t watch it. Don’t support that garbage.
It’s hard to perceive your “what do you mean?” as genuine, especially considering it wasn’t a vague reference. I think you could have asked, “Do you only mean abortion or is there something else?” and communicated your points in a less passive-aggressive “trap” framework.
Additionally, the original point only stated US governments are not protecting women, which is true regardless of your stance on abortion, regardless of the intended target of the law and regardless if it was intentionally targeting, “a war on”, women.
It’s obvious you were waiting for someone to finally say abortion so you could respond with that.
If women are dying because of laws denying them medical care that could have easily saved their lives, that is the definition of not protecting women.
How come Syria has to protect women, but US federal and state governments don’t?
How times have not changed.