What goes better with crackers?

Ethern’t.

Yeah, I hear you. Lots of things get said, but little gets done-- I can’t argue with that. But I’m looking for concrete examples because most of the goals and results people are expecting, from my perspective, are things that only get accomplished through legislation. Democrats have recently been focusing on voting rights. A solid voting rights bill would be a solid step toward tackling the issues you mentioned, but in June the most recent bill was voted against by all 50 Republican senators.

What are some examples of manipulation from the Democratic party that you are equating here?

Between the lines of “I don’t want to” reads “I have to”, which is easily disputed if said out loud.

It’s like… 2001 shareware shitpost flavored.

experts say crooks created fake businesses or lied about their numbers of employees to get access to more free cash

If you were creative and unscrupulous, you probably could have come up with something. Forged documents or the like.

Finley faces up to 30 years in prison, and paying more than $3.2 million in restitution, plus a $1.25 million fine.

But then there’s that.

As someone who didn’t have disposable income until I was in my thirties, I had a lot of catching up to do and the people there helped me out a lot.

Take 'im away, toys.

Might be right but in my experience a lack of skill in conversing with AI is a much greater factor in determining it’s usefulness. It’s almost always going to defer to the user. It’s like when someone is dealing with tech support and they tell them to try turning it off and on again. If that really is the solution, and the user insists that it is not, CGPT is going to make something up just to appease the user’s request.

Users have to know that CGPT isn’t magic. How they behave affects how it behaves. Kind of like talking to actual people, which is what it’s essentially trying to simulate.