Ohh that’s good. I always use the “try another outlet”, but it backfires sometimes when they move the whole desk to another outlet

deleted by creator

Which east Rome? The south east, the north east, the north less east, or the north less east again but more fascist?

If you don’t like bananas, potatoes have a lot more potassium by both weight and calories

That’s the disease that may qualify you for financial compensation

It’s been a pleasure knowing you DumbKid.

As far as taking scifi terms for real things, at least this one is somewhat close. I’m still pissed about hover boards. And Androids are right out!

deleted by creator

What kind of rapper name is steve

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

It’s hard to have this argument without coming across as advocating for eugenics, but I completely agree. The fact that increasing women’s education is so strongly correlated with decreased population growth is not a coincidence.

https://wol.iza.org/articles/female-education-and-its-impact-on-fertility/long#:~:text=The correlation is strong and,children per woman to two.

The difference between a eugenicists and whatever the hell I am is that I think the solution is to educate more people, not to control their right to reproduce.

17/24. I was so confident going into it…

Nice

How can you simply learn about a fact that doesn’t effect your life and just move on!? Get angry, be horrified, buy a weirdly long picket sign and go to every pride parade to express your discomfort and let it putrefy into a deeper bigotry

Historically “racist” is the bunk pseudoscience that claimed white people are more intelligent than other racial groups. When you refer to someone in the modern age as racist you are comparing them to those idiots. It wouldn’t make a lot of sense to compare somebody to that group for disliking white people.

To answer the deeper question you’re hinting at, although the post is racially predigest, making fun of white people for being white is generally considered punching up which is not frowned on in the same way as punching down.

You can’t trust those stats! My cousin’s friends sister is a nurse and she said…

So let’s do it like we’re bees under the light of the trees

He was the US secretary of state in the 1970s who finally died today after far too long living free. The 3 page rolling stone article is about as quickly as somebody could summarize his more notable war crimes. Admittedly the article is pretty biased, but also fuck hearing the other side of the story about a man responsible for so much death and pain.

Tldr: he extended the Vietnam war for about 5 years because it benefited him personally, he convinced Nixon to bomb Cambodia and laos which were not involved in any combat with us, he was involved in the coups that overthrew the democraticly elected governments of Peru and Argentina, he encouraged the use of nuclear bombs in battle on numerous occasions, and that’s just for starts. The rolling stone article claims he is indirecty responsible for about 4 million deaths. They don’t list the directly responsible number, but its likely in the one million range.